Recent Posts
Tag Cloud
abortion a queer thing happened to america atheism charlotte Church debate Dr. Michael Brown evangelism Frank Turek gay activism gay activists gay marriage God holiness Holy Spirit homosexuality Islam israel Jesus judgment Muslims Paul prayer pro-life prop 8 prophecy prophets Revival Scripture the churchArchives
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
How can you JUDGE a 3 year old and say “That is a gay kid!” that is disgusting. Who looks at a 3 year old and says “they are gay!” by what standard! by the way they are standing? by the clothes? or can you see deep inside of them? I am sure you could find one of my childhood photos where i look effeminate, but i am not gay. when I was 5 years old i purposely spoke with a lisp for attention for one day after i heard someone do it on tv, but my mom told me to knock it off so i stopped. I am glad she stopped me before some school counselor got their hands on my and started giving me hormone therapy and snipped off my genitals. stop judging children, you have no idea what they are thinking, and you cannot tell if a child is gay by looking at a photo of them.
I remember when I was 5 years old. I said this out loud and even in my thoughts. I wish I was a boy. Because I loved playing sports, not liked wearing dresses. But when I was in 1st grade I remember having a huge, huge crush on a boy. I am not gay. Never cared to be. So just because a kid looks a certain way or says a certain thing it does not mean they will turn out gay when they are older. Maybe I should make a video of my statement of wanting to be a boy. But turned out normal. Kids say and do things without understanding the full depth of what they are saying.
You should actually go and look at the blog. Have you? You are utterly and totally MISSING what this blog is about. AND, you’re judging the whole concept on HOW the blog came about, which was from the first pic he talks about. By the way, the boy IN that pic? Yeah, exactly – he IS gay.
You’re also missing the point that each person submitted their pic and story. You’re also missing, that the blog is NOT SAYING that if you exhibit certain traits, you are obviously gay. Again, you should view the blog first.
Actually, it doesn’t matter. Gay people have long stopped caring how heterosexuals – and especially those using religion – view their humanity, or their truth. Too bad you don’t use your platform to speak about things that actually effect other people’s live.
Stop being so obsessed with gay people. We’re all doing just fine as equal citizens of this country without you……..
James K.,
Of course I’ve looked at the blog, and, in particular, I was responding to statements made in the article. My comments were directed to statements like the following, either from the blog or the article:
From the blog: “As you’ll see – time after time – their sexual orientation was simply NOT a choice. Exactly the same way straight kids can’t choose their sexual orientation either. So for all those religious and political leaders still blathering that ‘being gay is a choice’ nonsense? STFU.”
From the article: “My first thought was, ‘Wouldn’t it be great if there was photographic evidence of gay kids that would show that being gay is something innate and it’s not a choice and that these things come out in us as children?'”
There is a clear agenda with the blog, as reflected in the article, hence my remarks in the show. Please listen again with these quotes in mind.
As for” being so obsessed with gay people,” I’m simply responding to the attempts of gay activism — which are in the news day and night — to redefine marriage, fill the heads of young children with gay propaganda, and steal people’s freedoms of religion and conscience, just to mention a few major issues. Gay activists came knocking at my door, so to say. I’m simply responding with truth, bathed in love.
I posted this on another article but it applies to this one too:
According to recent studies soy can be blamed in part for the queering of America. Soy used in baby formulas has been found to mess up the hormones and testosterone of babies.
“In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.
If you’re a grownup, you’re already developed, and you’re able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren’t so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you’re giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby’s endocrine system just can’t cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That’s why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today’s rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because “I can’t remember a time when I wasn’t homosexual.” No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can’t remember a time when excess estrogen wasn’t influencing them.
Read more: Soy is making kids ‘gay’ http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53327#ixzz1Gnuy8vrs“
Since the Asian world uses soy or rice and legumes for a complete protein in many nations of the world, where the food basket is not as meat oriented as in western nations, and my own son, who has acute food allergies does, I think it is premature to conclude that this is a cause for gay choice. There is no indication whatsoever that he is interested in other children of the same sex other than as friends at ten years of age. It would be good if he could eat eggs, milk, nuts, etc., but he cannot without his face swelling like a balloon, or becoming very ill.
Protein is the reason soy is popular, not because of sexual preoccupation. He can eat meat, but not with cereal, nor with after school cookies for snacks. When it was impossible for his mother to breast feed any longer what would he have done without soy. It is clear from our research at the time that different soy formulas had different nutritional results. We are thankful that it existed at the time. Curious here what other dairy allergic children parents recommend for their food allergy diagnosed ones?
Contrary to popular belief or American food propaganda (however you want to look at that) the Asians don’t eat a lot of soy and not as a protein replacement. What soy they do eat is fermented which changes the estrogen composition and doesn’t effect them. I suggest you read some of these articles. I use to think soy was the answer to my health problems but it actually was the source of my health problems, thyroid, PMS, sever cramps, early onset of menopause, and much more. I think research has come a long way to unveil a lot hoaxes and lies that the food industry has perpetrated upon the American public.
Soy dangers summarized:
http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/03summary.htm
http://www.mindbodyhealth.com/avoidsoy.htm
http://www.naturalhealthstrategies.com/dangers-of-soy.html
http://thyroid.about.com/cs/soyinfo/a/soy.htm
http://hiddensoy.com/
http://www.foodrenegade.com/dangers-of-soy/
K., You wrote of estrogen and your struggles; I wrote of my son’s needs. The tofu industry and that so related is present in my community, as are so-called “Natural Foods” groceries. It is so difficult to go to every person’s stores and look at packaged foods contents and always find Milk there. I do not doubt what your research has shown you. I do know also the difficulty of finding food without dairy which a ten year old will find tasteful.
When my son was in Norway this summer with the rest of his family he chose pork based meat, also not without health cautions, because that was what was available in groceries which he could eat. There never seems to be a perfect solution, so grace is requested at each meal. He is not an adult so that mindful choices can be executed over his taste buds and likes and dislikes at this juncture. We consider it a miracle if he can be 85% his recommended weight and height. Just getting him to eat is often a juggling act, and it can not usually be what is set before him, as in many families.
My question still lingers here, in spite of your self discoveries.
We all have to make choices on what we eat and sadly the food industry has all but poisoned us with their additives, including hormones in our milk, cheese, meats, etc. But hopefully in the long term the food we chose is not damaging to our health. Hope all works out for you.
reminds me of one person:
2 Peter 2:7 ” …who was distressed by the depraved conduct of the lawless” (NIV)
–“who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked” (NKJV)
— “distressed by the unrestrained behavior of the immoral” (HCSB)
— “worn down by the conduct in lasciviousness of the impious” (Young’s Literal Translation)
I think “worn down” describes this very well.
who would belive that such moral and emotional distress can be imposed on millions of people…???
Poor kids. They are used as means to an end – to propogate lustful agenda.
“As for” being so obsessed with gay people,” I’m simply responding to the attempts of gay activism — which are in the news day and night — to redefine marriage, fill the heads of young children with gay propaganda, and steal people’s freedoms of religion and conscience, just to mention a few major issues. Gay activists came knocking at my door, so to say. I’m simply responding with truth, bathed in love”
Just so I’m clear, you are saying that:
100% exact and equal rights for EVERY citizen of the United States = “gay propaganda” ???
No one is “stealing” your freedom of religion. We just don’t want you to have the
right to use it to deny OTHER people equal rights. THAT’S having a conscience…
If your marriage or anyone else’s is threatened by a gay person marrying,
please state and list how that effects you, DIRECTLY. 1000’s of gay men and women
have gotten married in MA, CT, UT already.
Go ahead, list all the ways you are DIRECTLY effected by gay marriage, or
ANYONE else’s marriage, really.
James, what’s with “directy” affecting me?
Are we suppose to be selfish? Is this immoral and wrong to care for what affects kids of other parents? I mean, by your “logoc” if I don’t have children why would I care if someone wants to molest kids? If I am not anorexic, I should care less for anorexia? You comment make little sense. We are responsible for caring for others around us and for society and culture in general. If someone wants to eat his/her new born baby, does it DIRECLTY afect me? Not really. Should I care? Of course I should. Your comment makes little practical sense… if any.
“100% exact and equal rights for EVERY citizen”
– this has never been achieved, nor will it be achieved in the sense you mean it to be. First, all ahve equal rights to get married (if it’s not same gender, not your relative, not a child, only one person, and is a human). There are conditions, of cousre. You cannot marry 5 people, three men and two women at the same time. Nor can you marry you brother and/or sister. Nor can one marry a donkey, simply because one feels animals deserve equal rights…
In other words, every citizen cannot marry whomever they want!!! There are common sense, logical, and beneficial to all restricitions. Anorexics do not have “equal rights” to starve themselves to death simply because their subjective perception of themselves indicates that they are “too fat”. If society sees a person with pathological condition, it is expected responsibility of caring society to intervene and correct the pathology.
“If your marriage or anyone else’s is threatened by a gay person marrying, please state and list how that effects you, DIRECTLY”
– same thing as I addressed above. How can some unrealated and living in different state man marrying three teenagers affect me? Well, what do you think?
How will a person who decide to cut of his/her arm and eat it affect me? Well, it makes little sense to put question in these terms. It is about sociatal approval of pathology and pathology’s effect on kids’ education and media and laws.. etc.
For example (how will promotion of pathology affect us), in California, there is a law (SB 48) pushed by homosexual acitivsts that if passed:
1. Textbooks and instructional materials must positively promote “lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans” as “role” models.
2. Children as young as 6 years old will be taught to admire homosexuality, same-sex “marriages,” bisexuality, and transsexuality (sex-change operations).
3. Children will be taught to support the political activism of “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Questioning” (LGBTIQ) political groups, as the bill requires “particular emphasis on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society.”
4. Teachers will be made to positively portray homosexuality, same-sex “marriages,” bisexuality, and transsexuality (sex-changes operations), because to be silent can bring the charge of “reflecting adversely.”
5. School boards will be required to select textbooks and other instructional materials that positively portray sex-change operations, same-sex “marriages,” and more, because to be silent on these subjects opens them up to charges of “reflecting adversely.”
6. Parents will not be notified, nor will they be able to exempt their children, from this new core curriculum.
Hi…I was very excited by the Barbara Walters special putting highlights on
small children who were obviously very disturbed by their gender. One two year old boy…
or shall we say “girl” walked into her mother’s bedroom, sizzors in hand…penis in the other. Isn’t that amazing?
It was obsious at that point that children can most certinally be born that way and most certinally
know that they are not in the right body.
The Walters special contended that it was very possible it was an improper gender imprint that took place in the womb, when the mother was dealing with hormonal inbalances. Thus the birth was of a healthy child,
with one set of genitals….and the opposite ” gender soul.” They certinally cannot be blamed for that.
There is only one thing God asks of them….that He asks of all of mankind. Be sexually pure. Period. Hetrosexuals must remain pure until marriage..but if they are not…society doesn’t care, everybody does it. Homosexuals never get permission from God to marry? Period. If they did…their sin would not be in their orientation…but in their sexual immorality.
All manking is required to obstain